By Ged Ladd
May 5 2006
Ged Ladd reviews the match and next steps for the team. It is positive, possibly provocative to some, but certainly well intended to all. Ged tries to draw some helpful lessons and conclusions, but is main conclusion is DO NOT DESPAIR.
HAMPSHIRE V MIDDLESEX MATCH
SUMMARY
REPORT AND OPEN LETTER TO
THE TEAM AND TO THE FANS
Ged
Ladd reviews the match and next steps for the team.� This report is in a sense an open letter to the
team and to the fans.� It is positive,
possibly provocative to some, but certainly well intended to all.� Ged
tries to draw some helpful lessons and conclusions, but is main conclusion is
DO NOT DESPAIR.� Ged
believes that the greatest risk to the teams chances at this juncture is
demoralisation, not an inherent problem with the team.
Summary and
The second
innings of this match was a much more impressive affair for Middlesex.� 344 is a very respectable second innings
score at the Rose Bowl.� Disappointing to
only add a further 139 runs for 7 wickets Day 3, but the very best teams in the
world regularly fold for less than that when Warne takes 7fers.� The die was cast in the first dig, from which
there was very little chance of escape.
What to do at the toss?
Before this
match, Ben Hutton must have wished for better luck at the toss, having lost
three on the trot before this game.� By
lunch on Wednesday, he must have wished he�d lost the toss.� At least if you are inserted you can blame
the track for a miserable first dig.� But
was the track that awful.� So hard for us absentees to tell � so easy for people to spout off
about it on the message board.
Admit it,
folks, at 50/1 we weren�t bemoaning Ben�s poor judgement at the toss.� Nor were we criticising the batsmen (Straussy excepted, but then he
redeemed himself second dig so that�s all right).� Nor was anyone questioning players�
commitment.
The Rose Bowl
is notoriously unpredictable and thus difficult to judge at the toss.� Many teams have come a cropper judging it
wrong, Hampshire included.� Test match status?�
Don�t make me laugh.
Lesson: If in doubt at the toss, the default option
is to elect to bat.� Do we want the team
to abandon that tried and tested adage? � do we heck.
Middlesex first dig
Was it the
pitch?� Was it ill-judged shots?� Was it a string of mishaps all happening
within a short space of time?� Will the
team benefit from endless machinations of this kind?
Every team has
the occasional shocker with the bat.� If
it becomes a habit, the team habitually loses matches.� There is no reason to assume that this will
become a habit for Middlesex.�
Individual
players might learn from the experience, be it shot selection, training their
temperament for collapse circumstances or whatever.� Some players might have little to learn from
that innings.� Most importantly, the team
must try and put the matter behind them; if we get into the mindset of a collapse-prone
team we shall become a collapse-prone team.�
Lesson: Middlesex has been a good batting side for
some time and should continue to be such.�
The players have every reason to believe in themselves as a batting
side.
Hampshire First Dig
I suspect we
didn�t bowl well enough on the first day of the match.� Perhaps morale had been hit.� Perhaps the bowlers got frustrated when they
had little luck.� This is not the first
time in history that bowlers have struggled to get it right after the batsmen have
failed to make a passable score.� Had we
scored 200+, perhaps the bowlers attitude and the rub
of the green would have gone better.� Hard to say.
Middlesex Second Dig
Much
better effort.� It is a shame so many players seemed to get
set and then got out.� Perhaps that is
the nature of the pitch.� Perhaps that is
the nature of playing Warne � you�re just never in.� Straussy�s innings
in that regard is excellent news for
Lesson: �Can we have our boy back please� whenever
we play matches in which Warne is bowling?
Looking Forward With Facts, Not Bile
I know I shall
be panned by some of the nay-sayers on the board for
saying this, but I really don�t think this match should be seen as a
bell-weather for the season.� We were
missing our key players.� Just study
these stats for a moment.
We lacked both
of our highest averaging batsmen from last season, Shah and Joyce.� Shah scored 1650 runs at 63 and Joyce scored
1668 runs at an average of 62.�� Between
the two of them, they scored 37% of all the CC runs Middlesex scored in the
2005 season.
We also lacked
our two highest averaging bowlers, Richardson and Styris.�
I challenge the
reader to argue that there is any team out there that could deplete its forces
so much and beat a full strength opponent.�
Take Pothas,
I understand
the counter argument � we are supposed to have strength in depth this year blah
blah, but that level of depletion, especially when
the opposition is full strength, is an important factor.� Yes, we shouldn�t have been caned so badly �
perhaps we even could have won this match if we had applied ourselves
differently.� But if a massively depleted
Middlesex ought to compete away from home against a full strength Hants, that
sounds like Middlesex is a strong squad that underperformed, not a weak squad.
Lesson: let�s try not to be without quite so many
of our better players all at once
Nil Desperandum � DO NOT
DESPAIR
In my view, the
team can and should bounce back from this defeat quickly.�
In my opinion, the greatest risk to the teams chances at this juncture is demoralisation, not an
inherent problem with the team per se.�
Despite the
spleen-venting by several nay-sayers on the Board, I
believe that the vast majority of Middlesex fans are rooting for the team and
still believe in the team for this season.
I believe the
team will finish the season in the top 5 of the CC and well away from the
relegation zone.� I also believe that
we�ll be competing for silver, possibly even winning it, in one of the one-day
competitions.� Remember who said it
during a rather dark hour.
So team � go
prove me right.
And fans � get
behind your team.
View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.
Bookmark or share this story with: