As part of a week off at home, we did a fair bit of cultural stuff. A rare visit to the theatre on the Monday did not work as well as the dinner afterwards…
…but this day going around galleries was memorably good.
We loved the Kandinsky watercolours, but the critics hadn’t been so keen on them, preferring Kandinsky for oils and criticising the way the exhibition had been curated. Richard Dorment in The Telegraph, for example.
Brian Sewell in The Standard was even more waspish.
Still, Ogblog is not about what those expert geezers think but it is about what we felt. I recall Janie and I really liking that exhibition, so much so that we set off later than intended for the Barbican, where we had chosen to see two exhibitions – in particular David Bailey’s The Birth Of Cool Photographic Exhibition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f4b4/4f4b46b4ea380e2b0fbb48c8b7bb5abfcc0f4bcc" alt=""
We loved these pictures. Who cares what the critics said. Well, actually I think the critics lined up in favour of this one.
Adam Edwards in The Standard celebrated the cool:
Whereas Jonathan Green in The Standard fretted that The Swinging Sixties weren’t so swinging for all. Who knew?
We also popped in to see New Art, New Era in the other hall at the Barbican
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89279/892793e3022a06f7916224620e19f8f93581b806" alt=""
We didn’t spend too long on this sweeping exhibition, little being to our taste, but we did enjoy some of the exhibits.
John McEwen in the Telegraph gave it a comprehensive review:
Brian Sewell in the Standard rubbished the exhibition even more comprehensively:
Heck, but we’d had a great day. Yah boo.