Hampton Court, Tennis, Gresham, Music & Drama

John Bull – First Gresham Professor Of Music

We have no evidence of a direct connection between Sir Thomas Gresham and Hampton Court Palace, but we do have evidence that Sir Thomas’s father, Sir Richard Gresham, supplied tapestries and drapes to Cardinal Wolsey for his new palace at Hampton Court, around the time of Sir Thomas’s infancy.

Around the time that Thomas Gresham was born, c1519, Henry VIII was still a relatively young monarch, about 27 years old, although he had already been king for some 10 years.

Henry VIII is reputed to have been a fine tennis player as a young man and also reputed to have been a fine musician. There is a rich tradition of late medieval nobles being enthusiasts of both music and tennis. Philip The Bold of Burgundy, some 150 years before Henry VIII, being a notable example and subject of a recent performance symposium:

Henry VIII: King, Tennis Player & Composer

Indeed, around the time of Thomas Gresham’s birth, a wonderful manuscript of polyphony was produced, known colloquially as the Henry VIII Manuscript. In British Library circles it is known as MS 31922. If you think “circa 1519” is a bit vague for the birth of Thomas Gresham, dig “circa 1510-1520” for the Henry VIII manuscript. Probably c1518.

The manuscript contains 109 pieces, including 20 songs and 13 instrumentals attributed to Henry VIII. If you have a DIAMM (Digital Image Archive of Medieval Music) registration you can peruse the whole book on-line here.

Question for the audience: would anyone care to name one or more of Henry VIII’s compositions?

No, not Greensleeves. But we shall come back to Greensleeves.

We have no reason to doubt the attribution of the Manuscript’s 33 pieces to Henry VIII. Some of those pieces are adaptations of existing works and others were doubtlessly written in collaboration with tutors, although Henry alone gets the credit.

Probably the best known of Henry VIII’s compositions is Pastime With Good Company. Let’s give that one a go.

Pastime with good company
I love and shall until I die;
Grudge who lust, but none deny,
So God be pleased, thus live will I.
      For my pastance,
      Hunt, sing, and dance.
            My heart is set:
      All goodly sport
      For my comfort,
            Who shall me let?

Youth must have some dalliance,
Of good or illé, some pastance;
Company methinks then best
All thoughts and fancies to dejest:
      For idleness
      Is chief mistress
            Of vices all.
      Then who can say
      But mirth and play
            Is best of all?

Company with honesty
Is virtue vices to flee:
Company is good and ill
But every man hath his free will.
      The best ensue,
      The worst eschew,
            My mind shall be:
      Virtue to use,
      Vice to refuse,
            Shall I use me.

Oxford Camerata under Jeremy Summerly (a visiting Gresham professor of music) have recorded Pastime With Good Company – you can hear that recording by clicking here or below:

Henry VIII’s composing days, to the extent that we have a written record of them, seem to have petered out by 1520 and his mortal coil was shed in 1547. Which brings us to the inconvenient truth – it is utterly implausible that Henry VIII composed the song, or even heard the tune of Greensleeves.

Greensleeves

Greensleeves was first registered at The London Stationer’s Company on 3 September 1580 by Richard Jones: “A Newe Northen Dittye of ye Ladye Greene Sleves”. It was the first but not the only ballad with Greensleeves in the title to be registered that month. Actually, in broadside ballad registration terms, a veritable epidemic of this new term, Greensleeves, broke out in early September 1580 and continued quite relentlessly for several years.

We cannot be sure whether any of the surviving lyrics were part of that initial 1580 bout of registration, but there is a very early surviving version of the song from 1584 in an anthology,  A Handful of Pleasant Delights. In that book the song is entitled:

 A New Courtly Sonnet of the Lady Green Sleeves. To the new tune of Green Sleeves.

We’ll be working from the 1584 version.

While it is entirely possible that tunes akin to the tune we now know as Greensleeves and lyrics akin to the 1580s lyrics might have been around for a while ahead of publication, it is unlikely that anything we might recognise as Greensleeves was around much before 1580.

My early music teacher, Ian Pittaway, explains the history of the piece on his website, click here or below.

The musical structure of the piece, which is grounded in the melodic, almost jazz-like progressions known as passamezzo antico and romanesca…

[Explain here/demonstrate what that means]

…which emerged in Italy in the first half of the 16th century, but this type of “ground” really caught on as part of the English style in the 1570s.

You can learn about and hear several examples of mid-16th century European composition in Christopher Page’s fascinating 2017 lecture: The Guitar in Tudor London – click here for all of the Gresham resources on that lecture or below to see the lecture:

While mid 16th century musical development will have come too late for Henry VIII, it is likely that Sir Thomas Gresham will have heard music in that style, during his several long stays in the low countries between 1543 and 1567. In particular, in the 1560s, when Gresham was Ambassador Plenipotentiary to Duchess Margaret of Parma, Antwerp and Brussels were melting pots of European culture. Burgon, in his Life and Times of Thomas Gresham, translates from a contemporary account of Antwerp by Lodovico Guicciardini, Description dc Tout le Pais Bas, &c. 1568:

It was not uncommon…to meet with a lady who could converse in five, six, or even seven different languages…

…on every side, and at all hours, were to be seen signs of festivity and merriment ; there was a constant succession of gay assemblies, nuptials, and dances ; while music, singing, and cheerful sounds prevailed in every street.

Sounds like my kind of town.

Whether it was this steeping in European music culture that inspired Thomas Gresham to endow music professorship, we’ll never know. Burgon thought it explained the choice of music for a professorship, whereas John Guy, in the most recent biography of Thomas Gresham, suggests that music (as a subset of astronomy) was part of the standard curriculum at Oxford and Cambridge in the late Tudor period and therefore not especially noteworthy.

We’ll also never know whether Thomas Gresham, who died in 1579, ever heard Greensleeves. It is, in my view, extremely unlikely that he heard either the specific tune or one of the lyrics that we now think of as Greensleeves, but it is highly likely that Thomas Gresham would have heard some progressive music of that kind, whether he liked it or not.

But what of the lyrics? I realised, when preparing this event, that I had never really listened to or thought about the words of Greensleeves. Of course I knew that the song was about a man who has courted a lady and not got anywhere, but I hadn’t REALLY thought about the words. I’m guessing that most of you have given this matter similarly little thought.

Your song sheets have got the first two and the last three verses of the 1584 version of the song. I have omitted the twelve middle verses, which I’ll explain when we get there.

Feel free to join in the chorus.

VERSE ONE

Alas, my love, ye do me wrong, To cast me off discourteously;

And I have loved you so long, Delighting in your company.

CHORUS

Greensleeves was all my joy, Greensleeves was my delight, Greensleeves was my heart of gold, and who but Lady Greensleeves?

VERSE TWO

I have been ready at your hand, To grant whatever you would crave, I have both waged life and land, your love and goodwill for to have.

CHORUS

Greensleeves was all my joy, Greensleeves was my delight, Greensleeves was my heart of gold, and who but Lady Greensleeves?

The next twelve verses describe in great detail the gifts that the unsuccessful suitor has heaped upon the lady in question. To paraphrase:

  • “kerchers to thy head”,
  • “board and bed”,
  • “petticoats of the best”,
  • “jewels to thy chest”,
  • “a smock of silk”,
  • “a girdle of gold”,
  • “pearls”,
  • “a purse”,
  • “gilt knives”,
  • “a pin case”,
  • “crimson stockings of silk”,
  • “pumps as white as was the milk”,
  • “a gown of the grassy green”,
  • “sleeves of satin” for “our harvest queen”,
  • “garters decorated with gold and silver”,
  • “a gelding”,
  • “servant men clothed in green”,
  • “dainties to eat”…
  • …”and a cuddly toy…didn’t she do well?

I described these inventory list verses to my young singing teacher, Lydia White, who said:

That is SO ick

The word Ick had not featured in my vocabulary until that moment, but I hardly needed to look up the definition to know what it means.

The singer/suitor, it seems to me, is utterly unsuited to the business of courtship. he knows how to let the lady and the listeners know how wealthy he is and how badly he feels he has been treated, without any self-awareness or understanding of what love is. He is pathetic and pitiful. Let’s sing the last three verses, which includes some language that sounds strangely modern, but I have not tinkered with the words – just a little with the spelling:

Let’s sing the rest of the song now.

VERSE FIFTEEN

Thou couldst desire no earthly thing, But still thou hadst it readily; Thy music still to play and sing, And yet thou wouldst not love me.

CHORUS

Greensleeves was all my joy, Greensleeves was my delight, Greensleeves was my heart of gold, and who but Lady Greensleeves?

VERSE SIXTEEN

And who did pay for all this gear, That thou didst spend when pleased thee?

Even I that am rejected here, And thou distainst to love me.

CHORUS

Greensleeves was all my joy, Greensleeves was my delight, Greensleeves was my heart of gold, and who but Lady Greensleeves?

VERSE SEVENTEEN

Well, I will pray to God on high, That thou my constancy must see, And yet that once before I die, Thou wilt vouchsafe to love me.

OUTRO

Greensleeves now farewell, adieu,

God I pray to prosper thee;

For I am still thy lover true,

Come once again and love me.

The Famous Victories Of Henry V

The difficulties we have attributing authorship of Tudor works is not confined to songs. It also applies to many plays. As does the desire to leap to the conclusion that someone famous must have written any interesting piece.

There is a famous scene in Shakespeare’s Henry V in which the Dauphin has sent a sarcastic gift of tennis balls to the new monarch, which snowballs the plot, via regal anger, to the Battle of Agincourt and English victory.

An anonymous earlier play, “The Famous Victories of Henry V”, includes that exact plot line – indeed many of the plot lines that unfold in Shakespeare’s second Henriad – Henry IV Parts One and Two plus Henry V.

The Famous Victories was probably written c1583. It must have been written by/before 1588, as there are accounts of William Knell and Richard Tarlton appearing for Queen Elizabeth’s Men in this play; both of those actors died in 1588. The play was first entered in the Stationers’ register in 1594, while the earliest surviving version was published in 1598. Here is a link to a full transcript of the play.

In “The Famous Victories”, the ton of tennis balls story arises in a long, pivotal ninth scene, set at Westminster Abbey, just after the coronation of Henry V. King Henry rejects his old friends, including Sir John “Jockey” Oldcastle – the Falstaff character – then turns his attention to seeking the Archbishop of Canterbury and others’ counsel on seizing the French crown. Henry’s counsellors sound hawkish, before introducing the Archbishop of Bourges who has brought with him an offer of money, the hand of Princess Katherine (which Henry desired) and a gift from the Dauphin:

ARCHBISHOP: And it please your Maiestie,
My Lord Prince Dolphin greets you well,
With this present.

[He deliuereth a Tunne of Tennis Balles.]


HENRY 5: What a guilded Tunne? …
I pray you my Lord of Yorke, looke what is in it?


YORKE: And it please your Grace,
Here is a Carpet and a Tunne of Tennis balles.


HENRY 5: A Tunne of Tennis balles?
I pray you good my Lord Archbishop,
What might the meaning therof be?


ARCHBISHOP: And it please you my Lord,
A messenger you know, ought to keepe close his message,
And specially an Embassador.

HENRY 5: But I know that you may declare your message …
To a king: the law of Armes allowes no lesse.


ARCHBISHOP: My Lord hearing of your wildnesse before your
Fathers death, sent you this my good Lord,
Meaning that you are more fitter for a Tennis Court
Then a field, and more fitter for a Carpet then the Camp.


HENRY 5: My lord prince Dolphin is very pleasant with me:
But tel him, that in steed of balles of leather,
We wil tosse him balles of brasse and yron,
Yea such balles as neuer were tost in France,
The proudest Tennis Court shall rue it, …
I, and thou Prince of Burges shall rue it.

This earlier play returns to the tennis ball motif several times later in the play. But in truth the dialogue is unexceptional. Shakespeare tackles the tennis ball story in Act One Scene 2 of Henry V, deploying his exceptionally rich command of language:

FIRST AMBASSADOR
Thus, then, in few.
Your highness, lately sending into France,
Did claim some certain dukedoms, in the right
Of your great predecessor, King Edward the Third.
In answer of which claim, the prince our master
Says that you savour too much of your youth,
And bids you be advised there’s nought in France
That can be with a nimble galliard won;
You cannot revel into dukedoms there.
He therefore sends you, meeter for your spirit,
This tun of treasure; and, in lieu of this,
Desires you let the dukedoms that you claim
Hear no more of you. This the Dauphin speaks.


KING HENRY V: What treasure, uncle?

EXETER: Tennis-balls, my liege.

KING HENRY V: We are glad the Dauphin is so pleasant with us;
His present and your pains we thank you for:
When we have march’d our rackets to these balls,
We will, in France, by God’s grace, play a set
Shall strike his father’s crown into the hazard.
Tell him he hath made a match with such a wrangler
That all the courts of France will be disturb’d
With chaces. And we understand him well,
How he comes o’er us with our wilder days,
Not measuring what use we made of them.
We never valued this poor seat of England;
And therefore, living hence, did give ourself
To barbarous licence; as ’tis ever common
That men are merriest when they are from home.
But tell the Dauphin I will keep my state,
Be like a king and show my sail of greatness
When I do rouse me in my throne of France:
For that I have laid by my majesty
And plodded like a man for working-days,
But I will rise there with so full a glory
That I will dazzle all the eyes of France,
Yea, strike the Dauphin blind to look on us.
And tell the pleasant prince this mock of his
Hath turn’d his balls to gun-stones; and his soul
Shall stand sore charged for the wasteful vengeance
That shall fly with them…

Scary.

In the Famous Victories play, at the end of Scene 12, King Henry reprises his verbal volleys about the tennis balls [did you see what I did there?], ahead of a rather corny Scene 13 in which French soldiers talk incomprehensibly in mock French.

In Shakespeare’s Henry V Act 4, Scene 4, Pistol encounters a surrendering French soldier:

PISTOL Yield, cur.

FRENCH SOLDIER Je pense que vous êtes le gentilhomme
de bonne qualité.

PISTOL Qualtitie calmie custure me. Art thou a gentleman?
What is thy name? Discuss.

FRENCH SOLDIER Ô Seigneur Dieu!

PISTOL O, Seigneur Dew should be a gentleman. Perpend
my words, O Seigneur Dew, and mark: O Seigneur Dew, thou diest on point of fox, except, O Seigneur, thou do give to me egregious ransom.

FRENCH SOLDIER Ô, prenez miséricorde! Ayez pitié de
moi!

PISTOL Moy shall not serve…

I’m glad to report, following several further rounds of corny misunderstanding, that Pistol spares the poor French soldier for the modest fee of 200 gold coins.

The nonsense phrase that Pistol utters is a reference to another hugely popular tune and song of the late Elizabethan era, Caleno Custure Me. Another song steeped in mystery and evidence-free theories, as analysed debunked and transformed into sensible analysis by Ian Pittaway here or below.

Caleno Custure Me was first registered at Stationer’s Register in 1582 but the earliest surviving version, like Greensleeves, is in A Handful of Pleasant Delights. It’s quite a lengthy song if you sing all the verses – this abbreviated version works well. Feel free to join in the Caleno Custere Me lines once you get the hang of this simple but charming tune.

VERSE ONE

When as I view your comely grace, Caleno Custure Me;

Your golden hair, your angel’s face, Caleno Custure Me.

VERSE TWO

With in myself then I can say, Caleno Custure Me;

The night is gone, behold the day, Caleno Custure Me.

VERSE THREE

Then how dare I with boldened face, Caleno Custure Me;

Presume to crave or wish your grace? Caleno Custure Me.

VERSE FOUR

And thus amazed as I stand, Caleno Custure Me;

Not feeling sense, nor moving hand. Caleno Custure Me.

VERSE FIVE

My soul with silence moving sense, Caleno Custure Me;

Doth wish for thee with reverence. Caleno Custure Me.

VERSE SIX

Long life, and virtue you possess:, Caleno Custure Me;

To match those gifts of worthiness. Caleno Custure Me.

REPRISE

When as I view your comely grace, Caleno Custure Me;

Your golden hair, your angel’s face, Caleno Custure Me.

Theatrical Performance At Hampton Court Palace

Before we move on to the only Shakespeare play that has a discernible Gresham connection, mentions tennis and has a music element for us to enjoy, I’d like to explore the notion that Hampton Court Palace hosted theatrical performances in Elizabethan times.

It is well documented that Shakespeare and The King’s Men (formerly The Lord Chamberlains Men) performed at least half-a-dozen plays at Hampton Court Palace over the Christmas & New Years period of 1603-1604. Queen Elisabeth had died earlier in 1603. By then the Tudor period was over.

I knew that troupes of players had put on Court performances in Elizabethan times and suspected that the idea of such performances in the Great Hall at Hampton Court Palace would not have been brand new in Christmas 1603.

Could I find evidence of theatrical performance at Hampton Court Palace in Elizabethan times?

My cursory searches drew a blank. I decided to consult Chat GPT on the matter. I won’t bother you with the largely nonsensical answers that the automaton tried out on me. But it did suggest that I seek advice on sources from experts in the history of Hampton Court Palace and suggested one sources itself: Philip Henslowe‘s diary.

Possibly I should have thought of that source myself. Philip Henslowe was father-in-law to actor-manager Edward Alleyn and I am an alum of Alleyn’s School. But I thought of that diary as a Jacobean artefact and I hadn’t twigged that Henslowe started keeping his records in 1591.

The evidence I was hoping for still took some finding, but an Edwardian analysis of the diary, Diary of Philip Henslowe, W W Greg, A.H. Bullen, 1904, references an Act of the Privy Council on 7 March 1592/93 (Volume 24, p102):

Thirty quid was a splendid haul for a three night gig in those days. Three pounds in takings for a night at The Rose Theatre was close to a top.

As for additional research materials, I must thank Lesley Ronaldson, Sarah Slater and Sandy Rhodes at Hampton Court Palace for their help in digging out sources and information for me. Several of the sources listed in the appendix below are thanks to them.

The early 1590s was a confused and confusing time for the theatrical companies. The Earl of Leicester’s Men had been disbanded soon after Leicester’s death in late 1588. Bubonic plague caused considerable disruption in 1592 and even more so in 1593. Companies were merging and cross-fertilising with each other just to survive. In late 1592 Lord Strange’s Men and The Admiral’s Men were united under Henslowe’s management.

We don’t know which plays Lord Strange’s men put on at Hampton Court Palace that Christmas of 1592/3, but we do know from Philip Henslowe’s diaries that their repertoire over that disrupted period mostly comprised:

  • Tamburlaine The Great & The Jew Of Malta by Christopher Marlowe;
  • A Knack to Know a Knave by Anon;
  • a lost play about Sir John Mandeville;
  • Jeronimo (aka The Spanish Tragedy) by Thomas Kyd;
  • Henry VI (part of parts unspecified) by William Shakespeare.

The 1592 revels at Hampton Court Palace almost certainly will have starred Richard Burbage and William Kempe, who both joined Lord Strange’s Men in 1592 plus Edward Alleyn, who married Henslowe’s daughter that year. It is even possible that William Shakespeare performed in that season, but his role with Henslowe’s companies at that time is undocumented and unclear.

Thomas Gresham, Tennis, Hamlet & Walsingham

Neither do we know which plays were put on at Hampton Court Palace by Shakespeare’s lot for the new King James Christmas 1603. But there is a strong suspicion that Hamlet would have been one of them. It was new at the time and might well have seemed pertinent to the newly-succeeded King and his Danish Queen.

Those of you who endured my lockdown webinar about tennis around the time of Thomas Gresham – still available by clicking here or below:

…might recall that the only reference to tennis in any biography of Sir Thomas Gresham refers to 1561 correspondence from Sir William Cecil, whose son, Thomas, took sanctuary at Thomas Gresham’s place in Antwerp having got himself into a spot of bother in Paris.

I see, in the end,” said the disapproving father in a letter to the errant youth’s tutor, Windebank on 4 November 1561, “my sone shall come home lyke a spendyng sott, mete to kepe a tenniss court.” 

Cecil was not referring to a grand court like that at Hampton Court Palace, of course, nor even to the more modest (yet still quite grand) court in his own home on The Strand. He was referring to the lowly tavern and gambling den sort of tennis court, for which trades folk sought (but were often denied) licences.

The really intriguing thing about that footnote of a story is that it found its way, some 40 years later, into a sub-plot in Hamlet. I spent some time in my 2020 Gresham piece exploring some of the wilder theories on this topic, not least the notion that Edward de Vere or John Florio might have written Shakespeare’s works.

As I said in that piece:

What is widely believed and is almost certainly true is that the character of Polonius in Hamlet was based on William Cecil and the character of Laertes, Polonius’s ne’er-do-well son abroad, based on the young Thomas Cecil. Scholars have suggested the Cecil connection for a great many reasons. For our purposes, Act Two Scene One of Hamlet has the sole mention of tennis in Hamlet, in a context that is reminiscent of the sole mention of tennis in Thomas Gresham’s biographies.

There are other clues to Polonius being based William Cecil. In Act One Scene Three, Polonius sets out “a few precepts” for Laertes ahead of his travels – for all the good they did in the matter of encouraging Laertes to behave himself. William Cecil wrote a treatise of precepts “to his son”, which was published subsequent to Hamlet but its existence would almost certainly have been known to the same insiders whose gossip about the Cecil family was in Shakespeare’s orbit.

While William Cecil’s daughter, Anne, did not have an entirely Ophelia-like story, she did have a tempestuous marriage/relationship with Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford and she did die tragically young.

Ophelia sings several songs in Act 4 Scene 5, known as “Ophelia’s mad scene”. The first of those songs, “How Should I Your True Love Know” is based on an Elizabethan ballad tune, Walsingham. The tune is by our old friend, Anon, the origins of the tune and various lyrics steeped in mystery.

Here is a relatively simple lute version of that tune:

The root lyric is believed to be this couplet:

As I went to Walsingham, to the shrine with speed
Met I with a jolly palmer, in a pilgrim’s weed

The Walsingham lyric, from there, in its various versions, takes the form of dialogue between pilgrims, one seeking their missing loved one and the other responding.


HOW SHOULD I YOUR TRUE LOVE KNOW?

Let’s have a go at the song, using the Ophelia lyrics from Hamlet, but rather than having Ophelia in her derangement sing both parts, we’ll try the question and response as a duet:

OPHELIA: ‘As you came from the holy land of Walsingham

Met you not with my true love by the way you came?’

PALMER: ‘How should I your true love know from another one?’

OPHELIA: ‘By his cockle hat and staff and his sandal shoon’

PALMER: ‘He is dead and gone, lady, he is dead and gone
At his head a grass green turf, at his heels a stone

‘White his shroud as the mountain snow, larded with sweet flow’rs
Which bewept to the grave did go with true love showers’

I must say, if that’s what a jolly palmer sounds like, I’m glad I have never met with a miserable palmer.

Because Walsingham was a popular pilgrimage site until the monasteries were disestablished in the 1530s, some music historians assumed the song to be early Tudor. But there is no evidence of the tune until the late Tudor period, at which time many major composers had a go at producing versions and variations on the tune.

William Byrd produced a piece for virginals (keyboard), 22 Variations entitled “Have with Yow to Walsingame”.

Not to be outdone, John Bull (who was the first Gresham Professor of Music), produced 30 Variations on Walsingham.

John Dowland had a modest go at a version of the tune for the lute…

The on-line transcription of my blog has links to good recordings of those several instrumental versions.

Rather than inundate you with variations and versions of Walsingham, we’d like to close with three pieces, one example by each of those three composers, all three relevant to today’s event.

William Byrd – Earl Of Salisbury Pavan

While William Cecil, Thomas Cecil and Anne Cecil all found their way into a tennis-related subplot of Hamlet, one famous member of the Cecil family, Robert Cecil, was omitted. Robert Cecil was a powerful man even before his father’s death in 1598, at which point he took over from his late father as Lord Privy Seal.  His power and status increased under James 1st, ennobled in James’s accession year and made Earl of Salisbury in 1605.

The story goes that Salisbury protected William Byrd when threatened with eviction from his home at Stondon Massey. 

William Byrd’s final resting place at St Peter & St Paul Church, Stondon Massey

Whether that story is true and whether it was for that reason that Byrd dedicated this pavan to the Earl of Salisbury we’ll never know, but the piece is very charming and beautiful nonetheless, on pretty much any instrument. As one further tennis connection, by the way, one of the Earl of Salisbury’s grand homes, Hatfield House, today houses a rather splendid real tennis court.

William Byrd’s domestic difficulties were probably connected with his recusant Catholicism, or at least his patronage by people, such as the Petre family in neighbouring Ingatestone, who were notable recusants.

John Bull – Dr Bull’s My Selfe

John Bull, the first Gresham professor of music, claimed similar persecution for his beliefs, when he fled England, for Flanders, in 1613, although it seems far more likely that his misdemeanours were carnal rather than theological. Sadly much of Bull’s music was lost or fliched by other composers when he fled, although we do still have his wonderful Walsingham variations, some extraordinary canons, the suggestion that he might well have written the national anthem, plus a splendid little piece known as Dr Bull’s My Selfe, a piece dedicated to his favourite person – a very early example of a selfie – in this case a musical one.

John Bull had a naughty boy track record from the outset as Gresham Professor of Music. He was indicted for criminal damage at Gresham House soon after taking up his Gresham College chair in 1597. We do not know the outcome to that case.

We do know that he was required to give up his chair in 1607, most likely on the grounds that he had to get married in a hurry, just a couple of weeks before his eventual bride gave birth.

His flight to Flanders six years after that appears to be a result of incurring the wrath of George Abbot, Archbishop of Canterbury, this time with Bull having been accused of adulty. Abbot had recently said of Bull:

“the man hath more music than honesty and is as famous for marring of virginity as he is for fingering of organs and virginals.”

Let us put to one side the Archbishop’s unfortunate choice of words to modern ears.  It does seem that John Bull found it hard to “keep himselfie to himselfie”. 

I am probably over-using my imagination when I listen to Dr Bull’s My Selfe, but I envisage Bull using this short piece as his theme tune at the start of each of his Gresham Lectures. It has a theme tune ring to it. 

John Dowland – Now Oh Now I Needs Must Part (The Frog Galliard)

Legend has it that John Dowland was mightily miffed when his application to be lutenist to the court of Queen Elizabeth was turned down in 1594.  So he might well have been similarly miffed when John Bull was selected to be the first Gresham professor of music ahead of Dowland in 1597. The following year Dowland took up a highly-paid post at the Court of  Christian IV of Denmark, who subsequently also took on John Bull in the latter’s flee to Europe years.

Dowland is said to have believed that it was his recusant religious beliefs that stood in his way with Queen Elizabeth, but that particular matter did not seem to hold back several other performing arts types.

More likely it was because the Queen liked upbeat performance pieces and upbeat performers. Dowland was reputedly downbeat in character and is best known for his melancholy songs, with titles such as “Flow my tears”, “I saw my Lady weepe” and “In darkness let me dwell”.

Dowland’s first book of songs came out in the Gresham College inaugural year, 1597. Now Oh Now I Needs Must Part, from that book, is a personal favourite of mine.

The instrumental version is known as The Frog Galliard for reasons rumoured to be connected with one of Queen Elizabeth’s suitors, François, Duke of Anjou and Alençon, whom she referred to as “her Frog”.

Coincidentally, François, Duke of Anjou, the youngest son of Henry II of France, was named after his late uncle François, Duke of Brittany, a Dauphin who died in mysterious circumstances in 1536 following refreshments after a rigorous game of tennis “pré[s] d’Ainay“. This is yet one more example of a great French tradition of regal deaths in the aftermath of tennis, going back as far as the untimely demise of Louis X “The Quarrelsome” in 1316, as reported in several of my earlier pieces on tennis e.g. Horrible Histories.

Also coincidentally, the courtly intrigue surrounding the potential match between Queen Elisabeth and François “The Frog”, which played out for some five years between 1574 and 1579, seems to have kicked off in the immediate aftermath of one of The Queen’s visits to Thomas Gresham at Osterley, in February 1574:

Feb 18,Thur OSTERLEY, Middlesex; Sir Thomas Gresham.


Court news. Feb 20, La Mothe [French ambassador Bertrand de Salignac de la Mothe-Fénelon] to Catherine de Medici [François, Duke of Anjou’s mum]:
“Francis Walsingham told me he had never seen the Queen so well disposed to marriage as at present, and he thought everything could be accomplished by a private interview. He said the Duke should regard the Queen’s heart as a strong castle which he might boldly carry by storm. He would lend any assistance in his power.”

Feb 20,Sat HAMPTON COURT.
On February 20 two Revels Officers hired ‘two geldings to Osterley and to Hampton Court to know my Lord Chamberlain’s pleasure, and back again to St John’s’. St John’s Clerkenwell, the Revels Office.

“The Elizabethan Court Day by Day” by Marion E. Colthorpe, licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 1574.

It seems that Thomas Gresham was not averse to a bit of theatre. In the above instance, presumably lending or giving some props to the revels. On at least one occasion it is documented that Gresham hosted theatrical entertainments at Osterley.

On one occasion [at Osterley]]there was a play by Thomas Churchyard, who wrote entertainments in the 1570s for several of the Queen’s progresses, as at Bristol and Norwich.
In Churchyard’s Challenge (1593) he lists his printed works, but without dates.
One item is: ‘The devices of war and a play at Osterley, her Highness being at Sir Thomas Gresham’s’. The play is not extant.

“The Elizabethan Court Day by Day” by Marion E. Colthorpe, licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. 1576.

Returning to Now Oh Now I Needs Must Part/The Frog Galliard, while the song and tune has no known connection with Shakespeare, when I appeared in and helped produce Twelfth Night at Alleyn’s School 45 years ago, our Deputy Headmaster/Director, John “Squeaky” Newton, insisted on us using this song/tune as a theme for the production. This piece has long had a place in my heart and makes a suitable closing number. 

VERSE ONE


Now, O now, I needs must part, Parting though I absent mourn. Absence can no joy impart Joy once fled cannot return.
While I live I needs must love, Love lives not when Hope is gone. Now at last Despair doth prove, Love divided loveth none.

Sad despair doth drive me hence, This despair unkindness sends. If that parting be offence, It is she which then offends.


VERSE TWO


Dear, when I am from thee gone, Gone are all my joys at once. I loved thee and thee alone, In whose love I joyed once.
And although your sight I leave, Sight wherein my joys do lie, Till that death do sense bereave, Never shall affection die.


Sad despair doth drive me hence, This despair unkindness sends. If that parting be offence, It is she which then offends.


VERSE THREE


Dear if I do not return Love and I shall die together, For my absence never mourn, Whom you might have joyed ever.
Part we must, though now I die. Die I do to part with you. Him despair doth cause to lie, Who both lived and died true.


Sad despair doth drive me hence, This despair unkindness sends. If that parting be offence, It is she which then offends.

Encore? – In Darkness Let Me Dwell:

To cheer everyone up, an even darker Dowland number, but in a rock and roll stylee. In Darkness Let Me Dwell…or perhaps more accurately, In Darkness Let Me Paint It Black:

VERSE ONE

In darkness let me dwell, the ground shall sorrow be,

The roof despair to bar all cheerful light from me,

The walls of marble black that moistened still shall weep,

My music hellish jarring sounds to banish friendly sleep:

VERSE TWO

Thus wedded to my woes, and bedded in my tomb

O let me living die till death doth come, till death doth come.

My dainties grief shall be, and tears my poisoned wine,

My sighs the air through which my panting heart shall pine,

VERSE THREE

My robes my mind shall suit exceeding blackest night,

My study shall be tragic thoughts sad fancy to delight,

Pale ghosts and frightful shades shall my acquaintance be:

O thus, my hapless joy, I haste to thee.

Further Reading & References

Specific References

Richard Gresham

Philip the Bold: Wine Tennis & Song

The Henry VIII Manuscript

A Handful of Pleasant Delights

Greensleeves: Mythology, History and Music (Part Two of Three, with links to the other two parts) by Ian Pittaway

The Famous Victories Of Henry V

The Life Of King Henry The Fifth by William Shakespeare

Calen-o Custure Me: a Tudor love song with garbled Gaelic?

“Shakespeare in Hampton Court Palace” by Ernest Law
(from the London Illustrated News, April 26, 1919, pp.596-599)

Diary of Philip Henslowe, W W Greg, A.H. Bullen, 1904

Act of the Privy Council on 7 March 1592/93 (Volume 24, p102)

Revels At Court: Extracts From The Revels Accounts Of The Reigns Of Queen Elizabeth And James I, Peter Cunningham, Shakespeare Society, 1853

“The Elizabethan Court Day by Day” by Marion E. Colthorpe, Folgerpedia, 2017,

John Bull, the first Gresham professor of music – Wikipedia entry

General Further Reading

Ian Harris’s Ogblog Tetralogy On The Origins Of Tennis:

Tennis: A Cultural History, Heiner Gillmeister, A&C Black, 1998 or Tennis A Cultural History (Second edition), Heiner Gillmeister, Equinox Publishing Ltd, 2017

Real Tennis Today and Yesterday, John Shneerson, Ronaldson Publications, 2015

Willis Faber Book Of Tennis & Rackets, Lord Aberdare, Hutchinson, 1980

The Annals Of Tennis, Julian Marshall, “The Field” Office, 1878

Colloquia Familiaria by Desiderius Erasmus, c1518

Antonio Scaino, 1555, Trattato del Giuoco della Palla (Treatise of the Ball Game)

La Maison Academique – 1659 – the first French book on games 

Signification de l’ancien jeu des chartes pythagorique et la déclaration de deux doubtes qui se trouvent en comptant le jeu de la paume by Jean Gosselin, c1582 

 A Treatise on Tennis By a Member of the Tennis Club, now attributed to Robert Lukin, 1822

Dialogus Miraculorum, by Caesarius of Heisterbach, early 13th century

The Ball Game Motif in the Gilgamesh Tradition and International Folklore by Amar Annus and Mari Sarv, January 2015

Second Frutes, by John Florio, 1591

De Corrupti Sermonis Emendatione, Mathurin Cordier (Corderius), 1536

The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England from the Earliest Period, Joseph Strutt, 1801

Anyone For 18th Century Tennis, Sarah Murden, All Things Georgian. February 2018

Tennis section of The Badminton Library of Sports and Pastimes (1st edition published 1890).

Lawn Tennis with the Laws Adopted by the MCC and the AEC&LTC, and Badminton, Julian Marshall, CFA Hinrichs (New York), 1879

The Manual Of British Rural Sports, John Henry Walsh (aka “Stonehenge”), 1856 (1867 edition attached) 

The Game of Lawn Tennis With the Laws Of The Marylebone and All England Clubs, Henry “Cavendish” Jones, De La Rue, 1888 

Lawn Tennis, James Dwight, Wright & Ditson (Boston), 1886 

Wright & Ditson Lawn Tennis Guide, 1894

Racquets, Tennis & Squash, Eustace Miles, D Appleton & Company (New York), 1903

Capping With Handicopes, Roger Pilgrim, Tennis & Rackets Association, 2010

Celebrating Women Baroque Composers, Roberta Invernizzi & Friends, Wigmore Hall, 11 September 2023

Barbara Strozzi (1619-1677), painted by Bernardo Strozzi

We spent a very pleasant evening at “The Wig” enjoying some early Baroque music, all composed by women.

Roberta Invernizzi and her gang performed the work of four composers:

Janie and I had enjoyed a lunchtime concert of the latter composer’s work only a year or so ago, at the hands of Nevermind – click here or below:

Strozzi and Caccini provided the songs – I suppose I should call them madrigals from that era. They were all operatic in style, which suits Roberta Invernizzi’s theatrical delivery and powerful soprano voice.

Invernizzi was ably supported by period instrumentalists, all extremely capable on their instruments. Two theorboes and a harp seems almost an embarrassment of plucked-string-riches, but the sound was lovely so we wallowed in the excess.

In truth, to our taste, the trio sonatas and passacaille of Leonarda and Jacquet De La Guerre respectively were more to our taste than the madrigals, but we enjoyed the whole concert.

Here is an example of a Leonarda sonata – coincidentally from an album primarily containing Roberta Invernizzi but not on this instrumental piece:

Below, from a separate recording, is Roberta Invernizzi singing Strozzi’s Sino Alla Morte, one of the madrigals we heard:

Here is a link to the Wigmore Hall stub for this concert. It includes a link to the programme which you can also find here.

It was a relatively short concert, 70 minutes, but short can also be sweet. This concert certainly was that.

The Hundred Finals Day At Lord’s, With Rudimental, 27 August 2023

Almost everything that I want to say in words about this event is contained in the “match report” on King Cricket – click here or below, where, in case you didn’t know, dear reader, I am Ged and Janie is Daisy:

If anything were ever to go awry with the King Cricket site, click this link for a scrape of that report.

Janie took a ludicrous number of pictures – you can see them all through the Flickr link below:

Janie and I were very motivated by the live appearance of Rudimental and mugged up on their hits in advance of the concert…I mean Finals Day.

I expected that we might see live performances of at least four Rudimental bangers and we were treated to all four of the ones I expected we’d see:

I was also hoping for this next one, which I especially liked when mugging up, but they didn’t do this one. Shoulda been a bigger hit in my opinion, but my opinion didn’t guarantee hits even when I was younger, let alone now!

A Day At Radlett Watching One Day Cricket With “Pinner Pear Fran” & “Yorkshire Simon”, 22 August 2023

Betwixt some noisy and frenetic visits to Lord’s for “The Hundred”, a quiet day of relaxed, county cricket at Radlett, as Middlesex were playing Yorkshire in the one day cup (50 overs tournament).

Long in the planning, this one. Yorkshire Simon had been waiting a long time for any Yorkshire cricket to visit Middlesex, so as soon as this fixture was announced Simon wondered if we might be able to keep this date free.

Attempts to watch out-ground cricket with Fran and Simon have often ended up soggy affairs. The lowest (or at least wettest) ebb being at Uxbridge six years ago – click here or below:

Ironically, given how very wet late July and August turned out to be in 2023, this particular day at Radlett was glorious sunshine made pleasant by kind smatterings of high cloud.

To some extent it felt like “a gathering of the clan”, as well as a gathering with Fran, as Janie and I ran into so many of the Middlesex supporting stalwarts, some of whom we hadn’t seen for ages.

In truth the cricket match was somewhat of a donkey derby – the last match for the qualifying group with both Middlesex and Yorkshire long since out of contention. But as it happens Middlesex dominated the match and for once chased down a decent-looking total without fuss.

Yorkshire Simon feigns uninterest while Ged observes rare Middlesex dominance

After chatting for a while after stumps, we wended our way home while the squad and stalwarts decompressed at the end of an unsuccessful campaign but a successful day.

A “Billy No-Mates” Visit To Lord’s To See A Bit Of The Hundred, 18 August 2023

After a busy week and a visit to Ben the chiropractor that afternoon (nothing to do with Olaf The Buddhist Viking, btw), I thought I’d stop off at Lord’s before going back to the house and catch a tad of The Hundred, given that both of my previous attempts to see any (Janie wimped out on 2 August) had been to a greater or lesser extent thwarted by poor weather.

I got to see men’s as well as women’s cricket. I located myself in the pavilion for the women’s game, then shifted to the Upper Allen for the men’s, seeking a slightly different view and a good location for a fast getaway.

I wasn’t wild about the Charles music as it sounded live from the stands at Lord’s, although I must say I got more out of it listening on SoundCloud when i got home. Click here to listen to some Charles.

The MC/DJ implored us all to make noise before the start of the men’s match, as oft she does.

I sneaked away from the ground soon after the start of the reply innings of the men’s match. You CAN have too much of a good thing. I didn’t want to sit too long and I did fancy a timely dinner with Daisy.

An Afternoon & Evening At Lord’s Watching The Hundred & The Rain With Colin “Olaf the Buddhist Viking” Stutt, 8 August 2023

Everything that needs to be said about a most enjoyable afternoon and evening at Lord’s with Colin is contained in the headline and my write up for the King Cricket website – click here or below:

In the unlikely event that misfortune ever befalls the King Cricket website, please click here for a scrape thereof.

Word-Play by Rabiah Hussain, Royal Court Theatre Upstairs, 29 July 2023

The Royal Court Theatre, Sloane Square by Stacey Harris, CC BY-SA 2.0

This was our first visit to the Royal Court Theatre Upstairs since before the pandemic. Until then, we were fairly regular visitors to that small space. Our previous visit, in 2019 had been a rare miss for us…

Word-Play was definitely not a miss for us, far from it, although Janie did find the short scenes with the actors playing different characters in different times and places more than a little disconcerting.

But we both agreed that the acting by all five cast members; Issam Al Ghussain, Kosar Ali, Simon Manyonda, Sirine Saba, and Yusra Warsama, was superb. Many of the scenes worked terrifically well, especially the more intimate ones. Word-Play is a very ambitious piece of writing and we shall certainly look out for Rabiah Hussain’s work again.

Here is a link to the Royal Court resource for this play/production.

This link should find plenty of reviews, most of which are good or very good – one or two not so.

It’s running until late August 2023 and we would certainly recommend this innovative piece of theatre if you get to this page in time to get a ticket.

Friends of Wigmore Hall 30th Anniversary Celebration Concert, 12 July 2023

Igor Levit in 2019 – Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, CC BY 2.0

You find out who your friends are when you go to this sort of concert…

…or more realistically, The Wigmore Hall management finds out who its friends are.

Frankly, I booked this concert because I fancied hearing the Liszt transcription of Beethoven Seven, which, in the end, Igor Levit decided not to perform. Never mind. This is the concert programme he chose instead.

Anyway, the “Friends Party” aspect was secondary in my mind.

Janie and I didn’t know that the Friends of Wigmore Hall had been going for 30 years. We are mere arrivistes at the place, starting our adventures there a mere 25 years ago, in 1998, with this concert:

..for which we befriended the place and then attended pretty regularly (several times a year, pandemic aside) ever since.

We previously saw Igor Levit at The Wig nearly 10 years ago:

After saying some fine words about how important the Friends of Wigmore Hall is to the hall and how important the hall is to his artistic life, Igor Levit played Schumann and Brahms instead of the Liszt.

After the concert, maintaining the Brahms and Liszt theme (did you see what I did there?) a drinks reception with Champagne for those who like alcoholic fizz and sparking elderflower presse for those who, like me, prefer their fizz non-alcoholic during the day.

On departure, Janie and I decided to thank John Gilhooly, who has been running the place extremely well for years, for the party.

John Gilhooly BIcam123, CC BY-SA 4.0

Janie and I confessed to not having been supporters for all 30 years. John told us that we didn’t look like those who had been supporting for 30 years. Perhaps he underestimated our ages and wouldn’t have guessed that we have supported for 25 of the 30.

We then chatted briefly about John’s campaign to try to introduce a younger audience to the Hall, which Janie and I applaud. John then made a slightly off-colour remark about the reception being a bit of a legacies marketing campaign event…”but not directed at you two, obviously”, he said.

So I suppose we’d better remove The Wigmore Hall from our bequests list, then. 😉

Seriously, a very enjoyable concert and event.

A Day At Wimbledon, Quarter Final Tuesday, Mostly On Court One, 11 July 2023

To the umpire’s left hand – Marketa Vondrousova, to his right hand – Jessica Pegula

We’ve had several lucky years of late in the Wimbledon ballot, not least last year when we scored really good centre court tickets:

This year – nada. Oh well…

…but wait! An opportunity to snap up a pair of returns…Good ones?…Quarter-finals Tuesday on Court One? Yes please!

So there we were again.

Forgive us if we look a tiny bit smug

The weather forecast was less than special but if you are on Court One you are guaranteed your main action of course.

As it turned out, it looked as thought the weather would hold through the morning, so we did our usual thing of setting off reasonably early to catch a bit of smaller court action before our main event.

First up, we fancied seeing some juniors tennis and chose Viktor Frydrych (of Great Britain) v Darwin Blanch (USA) on Court 12.

17-year-old Frydrych top, 15-year-old Blanch below

We saw Frydrych win the first set but I thought Blanch the more promising player given the age difference, plus the power and accuracy Blanch demonstrated at such a young age.

We moved on to Court 3 to catch the first set of a doubles match: Wesley Koolhof and Neal Skupski v Max Purcell and Jordan Thompson:

Umpire Fergus Murphy explains the rules to all four of them

Skupski top, Thompson below

Koolhof serves as Skupski waits to pounce

Koolhof and Skupski started slowly and looked a little out of sorts for the first 10 minutes or so, then quickly seemed to find their footing on a blowy day. Never let it be said that I don’t spot winners when I choose our morning of outer court viewing.

Still looking a bit smug

Then we needed to hot-foot it to Court One to be sure to catch the start of the quarter final action. Jessica Pegula v Marketa Vondrousova.

Do we look a little out of breath? We were there in time, just about. The nice lady with the pink cardigan behind us turned out to be even more of a tennis badger than us – she’s a self-confessed addict.

In truth, I wasn’t expecting this to be a great match because I thought that Vondrousova’s lack of form/experience on grass would be exploited by Pegula. What do I know?

In the end, it was actually a great match, with twists and turns and passages of great tennis.

Pegula top, Vondrousova below

After the rain/roof delay, Vondrousova took control and turned the match around. We were very impressed with her but still, frankly, did not expect her to win the tournament – I don’t suppose many people did. Still, well done her.

Rishi Persad asked Marketa Vondrousova penetrating questions of the “how does it feel to reach the semi-finals at Wimbledon?” variety. “Crazy” was Marketa’s pleonastic response word.

Next up, Jannik Sinner v Roman Safiullin. We were very excited to get a look at Sinner live, as we think he is a player with great potential. Again, I thought this match might be a one-sided affair as Safiullin has neither a track record on grass, nor going deep in slams. Again, this turned out to be a better match than we expected, with Sinner winning in four sets.

Safiullin serving, Sinner receiving

Apparently Sinner’s Gucci bag caused a fashionista stir

After that, rather than stick around for Invitation Doubles (or “Old Git Doubles” as I rather impolitely tend to call it), we took advantage of the improved weather and headed back to Court 3 where Jessica Pegula and Coco Gauff were taking on Laura Siegemund and Vera Zvonareva in third round doubles action.

Lovely views across Wimbledon from our seats there

Richard Haigh officiating

Laura Siegemund top, Vera Zvonareva below

Jessica top, Coco below

This was also the perfect opportunity to finish our picnic before going home. We had enjoyed our prawn and mayonnaise sandwiches during the Ladies Quarter-Final, but hadn’t felt hungry for our pork and apple sauce ones until after the Men’s Quarter-Final.

Sandwiches duly finished and Court One crowd mostly dispersed, we took our leave of Wimbledon towards the end of that Ladies Doubles match and wended our way home, “super tired but super happy”, as the young folk say.

All the photos (there are 80+ in all) can be seen on Flickr by clicking here or below.

Cuckoo by Michael Wynne, Royal Court Theatre,8 July 2023

Artwork grabbed for identification & to assist The Royal Court with this link

Janie and I really enjoyed this play/production, which we saw in preview. The acting was superb. The direction and design very high quality, as we have come to expect at The Royal Court over the decades.

This play was seemingly superficial, yet beneath its slight surface are some fascinating issues of our times. The “joke” that this family is spending its together time with each individual surfing their own virtual world quickly became tiresome – especially as some of audience members nearby were finding it hilarious. But that humorous conceit was soon revealed as a foreshadowing of some darker elements of the characters’ inner/virtual worlds.

Yes, as some of the critics have said, not a lot happens, but this particular “not a lot” is both amusing and highly thought-provoking.

OK, I have a confession to make.

When I booked this, my main criterion for booking it was a recollection that one of Michael Wynne’s previous plays, The People Are Friendly, had pleased us both a lot.

2002, we saw this at The Royal Court (not yet Ogblogged)

Soon after the start of Cuckoo, which shares a couple of the lead actresses and Royal Court production aspects with The People Are Friendly, I realised that we had not liked The People Are Friendly; we found it soap-opera-ish and not to our taste. I was confusing The People Are Friendly with Richard Bean’s England People Very Nice:

I shall revisit the play text of The People Are Friendly before writing up our 2002 experience, as it is possible that I will read more into that play now than we did 20 years ago.

Anyway, apologies to Messrs Wynne and Bean for the confusion. The word “People” in the title shouldn’t be enough for such a muddle really. I just jumped to a conclusion…

…and talking of conclusions, Janie and I both thought the ending of Cuckoo was really rather wonderful, both as a coup de theatre and also as a piece of stage design.

Here again is a link to The Royal Court resources on Cuckoo, which is running until mid August.

While this link should find most/all the formal reviews for you, if you like those and/or don’t trust our judgment.